BizTalk Utilities CV ,   Jobs ,   Code library  
 
Home Page
Uncategorized
Learning the Lessons of WAP
WAP Overview
Building Usable WAP Applications
Version Forward
Aprenda XML (Spanish version of Learn XML)
Converting HTML to WML
Database Web Application Wizard
Client-Side Presentation Logic
Learn XML
The Understanding XML Game
Dynamic functions: Functional combination, partial application and lambda expressions
An exploration of XML in database management systems
Code Samples 1
Code Samples 2
Using XML to manage a wizard
An enhancement of the Microsoft XML Class Generator
Format XML
Sending Binary Data in XML to server
Retrieving a Registry subtree as XML
An example of creating practical and efficient client-side, offline, standalone, server-independent
<< System.XML
WCF, WS, SOAP >>

By :Mark Wilson
I am the creator of TopXML. I am available for international and local (Australia) contracts. I am a Solution Architect/Business Analyst. I have worked in IT in several countries (NZ, Australia, South Africa, UK) building and training teams for government and very large non-governmental organizations. I am ex-Microsoft Consulting Services. I wrote the first book on Microsoft XML published in 2000 called XML Programming with VB and ASP. Most recently I have been building tools for the SEO industry. Ask me for a 37 point SEO health-checkup for your website.
First posted :04/09/2001
Times viewed :163

 
Page 1 of 11

 

  Table Of Contents Next Page

The Future of WAP: v1.2 and Beyond

Andy Wigley, Secure Trading

Get the accompanying slides in PDF format

(Optional) Get this article in PDF format

 

Currently, the WAP browsers and gateways available in the marketplace support WAP v1.1 specifications. However, WAP v1.2 was approved by the WAP Forum in November 1999, and a minor revision (v1.2.1) has now been released too. Browsers and gateways supporting the functionality it defines should reach the market before the end of 2000.

 

WAP v1.2 has the same functionality as WAP v1.1, and continues the incorporation of detailed feedback from implementers. The main thrust of v1.2 has been to remove ambiguities and to make minor editorial corrections to the v1.1 specifications. At present, developers all too often find themselves in the unsatisfactory position of coding to the 'lowest common denominator', in order to address the presentational differences between, for example, Nokia and Phone.com browsers.

Page 1 of 11

 

  Table Of Contents Next Page

Rate this article on a scale of 1 to 10

Your vote :  


 

Recent Jobs

Sr. Software Engineer - Analytics
Immediate Mainframe openings for Ch
Immediate TANDEM-TAL openings for C
Immediate ASP.NET/C# Openings for C
Sr. Software Engineer

View all Jobs (Add yours)
View all CV (Add yours)



swimming pool contractor
conference call
water softener
Teleconference
Host Department NOLIMIT Web Hosting
MSN
sunglasses
help desk support


    Email TopXML  

Front Page Daily Stuff TopXML Forum XML blogs XML Newsgroups BizTalk Biztalk Utilities Biztalk Utilities Tutorial B2B SAP XML Microsoft .NET Dotnet System XML Soapformatter SQLXML XMLserializer XQuery PHP PHP SimpleXML PHP XML Dom PHP XML RPC PHP XSLT Java Java Java XML Xalan Microsoft ASP ASP Schemas XML SQL Server XML XMLDom XSL XSL Tutorial XSLT Stylesheets General Javascript CSS XHTML WAP